The Role of Entrainment and Aperiodicity in Vibrotactile Discrimination

Abstract

The extent to which entrainment – the phenomenon in neuroscience where neurons synchronize their firing patterns to external stimuli with rhythmic or periodic features – occurs in response to aperiodic or irregular flutter stimuli remains debatable. It has been proposed by Mountcastle et al. that information is processed in a periodic manner; however, more recently, Romo et al. challenged Mountcastle’s theory and proposed that flutter stimulus was encoded based on the rapidly adapting fibers, not the periodicity.1-5 Therefore, if Mountcastle et al. is correct, the brain should be more adept at discriminating frequency between periodic stimuli than between aperiodic stimuli; conversely, if Romo et al. is correct, the brain should be equally good at discriminating frequencies between periodic and aperiodic stimuli. In this study, a two-point vibrotactile stimulation device (The Brain Gauge, Cortical Metrics, USA) was used to stimulate digits II and III of 43 participants’ preferred hand to determine their difference limen (DL) for both amplitude (AD) and frequency (FD) discrimination tests, given aperiodic or periodic stimuli. The tests were performed in the following order: periodic AD, aperiodic AD, periodic FD, and aperiodic FD. The results suggest that the periodicity of the stimuli affects frequency discrimination more than amplitude discrimination and the participants were significantly better at discriminating stimuli with periodic frequencies than aperiodic frequencies. A paired, one-tailed t-test indicated that the subject DLs resulting from periodic stimuli were significantly different (p<0.05) from that resulting from aperiodic stimuli for frequency discrimination, while it was not statistically significant for amplitude discrimination. The results were in favor of Mountcastle’s theory; however, more trials with a more controlled experimental environment may be needed to definitively conclude.