Abstract

The transition from postindustrialism to knowledge-based economy requires a fundamental transformation of education system. Therefore, in the last decade, national governments and education institutions have been challenged by new demands set by the European Union and UNESCO to re-orient a traditional disciplinary paradigm of education towards Education for Sustainable Development (ESD). It is a more contextualized approach to education, which seeks to systematically and innovatively address complex socio-economic and environmental issues of a contemporary globalized society. ESD relies on a joined-up and cross-discipline thinking and practice which serves to uniquely and creatively configurate ideas from different fields. Thus, the new paradigm of education recognizes the importance of developing innovative and creative thinking of learners, as well as a strong interrelation between sustainable development and innovation. The current paper aims to identify the role of ESD in fostering innovativeness of students from different engineering fields at technical universities. Moreover, it seeks to reconsider the concepts of innovativeness and creative thinking in terms of a new paradigm of knowledge. It also questions whether teachers’ and students’s attitudes toward these competences could possibly have some effects on developing them in students. Finally, it seeks to check a hypothesis that there is a correlation between lecturers’ attitudes toward students’ creative capabilities and students’ self-evaluation. The relevance of the research lies in the fact that in the face of local and global challenges, universities are reluctant or slow to transform the traditional paradigm of education into a new one. There is a lack of consistency in implementing the principles of ESD in curricula of universities. Very often technical universities show inadequate attention to interdisciplinary and context-specific model of learning as well as such general purpose competences as innovativeness and creative thinking. This threatens universities to become technocratic institutions. The present study employs qualitative descriptive and explanatory research methods. An extensive research and a critical evaluation of international and Lithuanian literature on the field have been done in order to offer the current perspective on the issue. What is more, a pilot survey on the students of Lithuanian technical universities supplementes the qualitative research by providing with their opinions on the issue. The results of a theoretical study points out to some limitations of a traditional disciplinary paradigm which fails to foster students’ creativity and innovativeness at technical universities at their full potential. Similarly, the findings of the students’ survey support the results of the qualitative study. However, they also reveal a significant potential of ESD to spawn these general purpose competences, which, in a long-term, could contribute to sustainable development at the national and global levels DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.eis.0.7.4143

Highlights

  • An international community has been continuously trying to deal with long-term consequences of the industrial revolution, which relied on a mass exploitation and heavy dependency on non-renewable energy resources

  • The survey is aimed to provide with responses from students to find out their opinions on the importance of developing innovativeness in students from engineering study programmes at technical universities

  • Education for Sustainable development (ESD) has to be placed at the centre of sustainable development practices

Read more

Summary

Introduction

An international community has been continuously trying to deal with long-term consequences of the industrial revolution, which relied on a mass exploitation and heavy dependency on non-renewable energy resources. The European Union and UNESCO have introduced the EU Sustainable Development strategy (EU SDS) which is aimed at managing the transitional process. The transitional process towards sustainability, first of all, has to include reorientation of education. UNESCO acknowledges that “education needs to be central to personal, community, social, national and global development” (UNESCO, 2010). Education for Sustainable development (ESD) has been attributed a very prominent role in achieving the goals of the EU SDS. ESD proclaims that education systems must reflect transformative imperatives imposed by changing conditions of the times. It stresses globalization as a very important factor to be considered when adjusting existing education systems and practices to respond to the demands of knowledge society

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.