Abstract

In 1995-1997, we studied the factors which may influence the ground of Carabidae using pitfall traps placed in winter wheat, winter rape and pea stands (1995 only) grown within a 1 km2 area with uniform physical conditions. The traps were placed in plots of bare ground established within the crops and under surrounding intact plant stands. The communities were similar between crops within years (Pearson's correlation coefficient r = 0.60 - 0.81), and between years within crops (r = 0.89 - 0.91), except for the poor winter rape stand in 1997. Factors influencing carabid were: (i) Density of crop stand. The carabids preferred crop-shaded ground as long as crop density was low or medium but moved to bare ground plots when crop density became high. Under moderate crop density the preference differed between beetle species, most of which preferred crop-shaded ground while a few ones preferred bare ground. Carabid preferences were probably determined by microclimatic differences caused by presence and density of crop cover. (ii) Presence of seeds dropped on the ground. In rape stands, presence of crop and weed seeds increased the of seed predators (species of genera Amara, Harpalus, Ophonus and Pseudoophonus). Scattering of rape seeds significantly increased local activity density of Harpalus affinis and H. distinguendus in the wheat stand. (iii) Presence of aphids. Activity density of Bembidion lampros and Trechus quadristriatus and between-year variation in pooled abundance of the five species recognised as aphid predators was associated with variation in aphid abundance.

Highlights

  • Numerous studies have investigated “activity density” of carabid species, i.e. number of individuals randomly moving per unit area over a unit time interval (Thiele, 1977)

  • Activity density was usually estimated by pitfall traps whose catches are, for a given species, well corre­ lated with absolute species abundance (Adis, 1979)

  • Using pitfall traps is thusjustified for comparing commu­ nities consisting largely of the same species

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Numerous studies have investigated “activity density” of carabid species, i.e. number of individuals randomly moving per unit area over a unit time interval (Thiele, 1977). Using pitfall traps is thusjustified for comparing commu­ nities consisting largely of the same species. The abundant species are common over geographic areas with similar climates but their abundance varies annually. This variation concerns local populations (den Boer, 1977; Jones, 1979) and metapopulations of larger areas (Honek & Pulpan, 1983). The relative importance of local factors for determining species abun­ dance could only be revealed by a synchronous study

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.