Abstract

The aim of this paper is to illustrate that courts play an important role in the domestic protection of socio-economic rights. In order to ensure that socio-economic rights are effectively protected and enforced, this paper identifies and discusses the framework for protecting socio-economic rights under the 2013 Constitution. The paper discusses the role of the courts in the domestic framework for protecting socio-economic rights under the 2013 Constitution. Secondly, the study discusses the role of the courts in the protection of socio-economic rights. The paper further identifies some of the major conceptual and practical challenges that are likely to arise in the adjudication of socio-economic rights. In that regard, the study attempts to come up with solutions meant to overcome the conceptual and practical challenges that are faced in the enforcement of socio-economic rights. For example, instead of adopting a purely legal-centric approach in interpreting socio-economic rights, it is suggested that courts should adopt a multidisciplinary approach taking into account founding values, historical background, political background, international human rights law norms and comparative law.

Highlights

  • It is widely accepted that without legal enforceability mechanisms, socio-economic rights amount to no more than pragmatic ideals (Wiles 2006:35-64)

  • The inclusion of socio-economic rights under the Constitution fulfils the legislative obligation imposed by the International Covenant of Economic Social and Cultural Rights and the Banjul Charter on Zimbabwe as a state party

  • Zimbabwe sought to set up a framework to ensure socio-economic rights in the Constitution are promoted and protected, where necessary proper redress is provided

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is widely accepted that without legal enforceability mechanisms, socio-economic rights amount to no more than pragmatic ideals (Wiles 2006:35-64). The judicial enforcement of socioeconomic rights is a powerful indication that the Constitution’s vision goes beyond merely guaranteeing abstract equality – rather courts must ensure that these rights become a reality It is the vision of the Constitution to ensure democracy, transparency, accountability, good governance and the rule of law (Constitution 2013: section 3). It is beyond the scope of this article to engage in a comprehensive comparative analysis, reference will be made to the judicial enforcement of socio-economic rights under the 1996 South African Constitution. This is because the judiciary in that country has played a significant. The third section discusses another conceptual and practical challenge in the socio-economic rights discourse, the remedial framework in adjudicating socio-economic rights

Role of judiciary under the Constitution
Purposive interpretation through the prism of the Bill of Rights
Reasonableness approach
Reasonableness as interpreted by South African Courts
Minimum core obligation
Integrated approach
Conclusion
List of References
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call