Abstract
This paper seeks to critique the decision of the court of appeal in Mitu bell where judges refused the ethos of the 2010 constitution which required them to be innovative and instead upheld the practice of the past. This paper will firstly look at the place of socio-economic rights in Kenya, secondly the judicial enforcement of socio-economic rights, thirdly the remedy of structural interdict as one of the innovative remedies before making a conclusion.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
