Abstract

We consider the benefits of coding in wireless networks, specifically its role in exploiting the local broadcast property of the wireless medium. We first argue that for unicast, the throughput achieved with network coding is the same as that achieved without any coding. This argument highlights the role of a general max-flow min-cut duality and is more explicit than previous proofs. The maximum throughput can be achieved in multiple ways without any coding, for example, using backpressure routing, or using some centralized flow scheduler that is aware of the network topology. However, all such schemes, in order to take advantage of the local broadcast property, require dynamic routing decisions for choosing the next hop for each packet from among the nodes where it is successfully received. This choice seems to depend critically on feedback signaling information like queue lengths, or ARQ. In contrast, note that the use of network coding can achieve the same without such feedback, in exchange for decoding overhead.A key issue to be resolved in making a comparison between routing and coding would be how critical feedback signaling is, for the throughput of routing policies. With this motivation, we first explore how feedback at a given node affects its throughput, with arbitrary rates of its one-hop neighbors to the destination. Static routing policies which are essentially feedback independent, are considered. An explicit characterization of the optimal policies under such a feedback constraint is obtained, which turns out to be a natural generalization of both flooding and traditional routing (which does not exploit local broadcast, because the next hop is fixed prior to the transmission). When losses at the receivers are independent (still allowing for dependencies on transmissions by two different nodes, to model interference), the reduction in capacity due to constraining the feedback is limited to a constant fraction (e−1=37%) of the coding capacity, and gets arbitrarily close to optimal as the unconstrained capacity goes to zero. We also extend this analysis to a layered multihop network and also compare the throughput of flooding to backpressure via simulations for a layered network assuming independent losses. Finally, if there are dependencies in the losses seen by receivers from a single broadcast, the reduction could be arbitrarily bad, even with just two hops.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.