The Role of Chloro Substituents in Solid Inclusion Formation. Crystal Structures Formed by a Bulky Hydroxy Host with Ethyl Acetate (2:1) and Cyclohexylamine (1:2) as Guest

Abstract

Two inclusion compounds of the 11-[bis(p‐chlorophenyl)hydroxymethyl]-9,10-dihydro-9,10-ethanoanthracene host (1) have been studied by X-ray diffraction in order to find an explanation of the exceptional clathrate formation ability of the present chloro-containing host as compared with that of closely related chlorine-free host analogues. Crystal data: 1·ethyl acetate (2:1), C27H22OCl2·½(C4H8O2), Mw = 501.45, P21/c, a = 8.9060(5), b = 11.1109(6), c = 25.642(1) Å, β = 99.03(1)°, Z = 4, R = 0.047 for 2029 F values with I>2σ(I); 1·cyclohexylamine (1:2), 2[C29H22OCI2·2(C6H13N)], Mw = 1311.50, Pc, a = 12.144(2), b = 12.689(3), c =23.119(8) Å, β = 91.68(1)°, Z = 2, R = 0.054 for 3073 F values with I>2σ(I). Although the two solid inclusion compounds differ in host‐guest stoichiometry, space group symmetry and also in host‐guest recognition mode, both co-crystals are held together by numerous C‒H…X (X = O, N or Cl) interactions, in which the chloro-substituents of 1 play a very active role. The observed frequent participation of chlorine in intermolecular interactions in these compounds suggests an ability of the (C‒)Cl substituents to effectively enhance the crystal formation in the absence of more dominant forces.