Abstract

Brain‐derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) signaling is implicated in the etiology of many psychiatric disorders associated with altered emotional processing. Altered peripheral (plasma) BDNF levels have been proposed as a biomarker for neuropsychiatric disease risk in humans. However, the relationship between peripheral and central BDNF levels and emotional brain activation is unknown. We used heterozygous BDNF knockdown rats (BDNF +/−) to examine the effects of genetic variation in the BDNF gene on peripheral and central BDNF levels and emotional brain activation as assessed by awake functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). BDNF +/− and control rats were trained to associate a flashing light (conditioned stimulus; CS) with foot‐shock, and brain activation in response to the CS was measured 24 h later in awake rats using fMRI. Central and peripheral BDNF levels were decreased in BDNF +/− rats compared with control rats. Activation of fear circuitry (amygdala, periaqueductal gray, granular insular) was seen in control animals; however, activation of this circuitry was absent in BDNF +/− animals. Behavioral experiments confirmed impaired conditioned fear responses in BDNF +/− rats, despite intact innate fear responses. These data confirm a positive correlation [r = 0.86, 95% confidence interval (0.55, 0.96); P = 0.0004] between peripheral and central BDNF levels and indicate a functional relationship between BDNF levels and emotional brain activation as assessed by fMRI. The results demonstrate the use of rodent fMRI as a sensitive tool for measuring brain function in preclinical translational studies using genetically modified rats and support the use of peripheral BDNF as a biomarker of central affective processing.

Highlights

  • Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and tropomyosin-related kinase B receptor (TrkB) levels Serum BDNF protein levels were 73% lower in BDNF+/− rats compared with control rats [−0.87 ng/ml; 95% CI (−1.2, −0.59); t10 = 6.8, P < 0.0001; Table 1]

  • Central BDNF protein levels were significantly lower in BDNF+/− compared with control rats; 31% lower in the hippocampus [−1.1 ng/g ww; 95% CI (−1.5, −0.7); t10 = 5.6, P = 0.0002; Table 1], and 45% lower in the amygdala [−1.3 ng/g ww; 95% CI (−2.3, −0.3); t11 = 2.8, P = 0.017, Table 1]

  • 24 h after cued fear conditioning, all rats showed increased freezing behavior in response to CS presentation confirming that control and BDNF+/− rats detected the visual stimulus, the response to the first CS was significantly reduced in the BDNF+/− rats compared with controls

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) signaling is implicated in the etiology of many psychiatric disorders associated with altered emotional processing. Behavioral experiments confirmed impaired conditioned fear responses in BDNF+/− rats, despite intact innate fear responses These data confirm a positive correlation [r = 0.86, 95% confidence interval (0.55, 0.96); P = 0.0004] between peripheral and central BDNF levels and indicate a functional relationship between BDNF levels and emotional brain activation as assessed by fMRI. The results demonstrate the use of rodent fMRI as a sensitive tool for measuring brain function in preclinical translational studies using genetically modified rats and support the use of peripheral BDNF as a biomarker of central affective processing. Given the relevance of BDNF to human emotional disorders and the translational potential of transgenic rats, in this study, we investigated emotional learning in a genetically modified rat model of reduced BDNF expression

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call