The role of boundary organizations in co-management: examining the politics of knowledge integration in a marine protected area in Belize

Noella J Gray

doi:10.18352/ijc.643

Abstract

Marine protected areas (MPAs) are an increasingly popular tool for management of the marine commons. Effective governance is essential if MPAs are to achieve their objectives, yet many MPAs face conflicts and governance challenges, including lack of trust and knowledge integration between fishers, scientists, and policy makers. This paper considers the role of a boundary organization in facilitating knowledge integration in a co-managed MPA, the Gladden Spit and Silk Cayes Marine Reserve in Belize. Boundary organizations can play an important role in resource management, by bridging the science-policy divide, facilitating knowledge integration, and enabling communication in conditions of uncertainty. Drawing on ethnographic research conducted in Belize, the paper identifies four challenges for knowledge integration. First, actors have divergent perspectives on whether and how knowledge is being integrated. Second, actors disagree on resource conditions within the MPA and how these should be understood. Third, in order to maintain accountability with multiple actors, including fishers, government, and funders, the boundary organization has promoted the importance of different types of knowledge for different purposes (science and fishers’ knowledge), rather than the integration of these. Finally, a lack of trust and uneven power relations make it difficult to separate knowledge claims from political claims. However, even if knowledge integration proves difficult, boundary organizations may still play an important role by maintaining accountability, providing space for conflicting understandings to co-exist, and ultimately for governance institutions to evolve.

Highlights

Marine protected areas (MPAs) have proliferated in recent years, the result of a coordinated global conservation effort (Gray 2010).1 They are designed to meet a variety of ecological objectives, including the conservation, management, or restoration of species, fisheries, habitats, ecosystems, and/or ecological services, as well as social objectives such as the alleviation of poverty in coastal communities (Fox et al 2012)
This paper considers the role of a boundary organization in facilitating knowledge integration in a co-managed MPA, the Gladden Spit and Silk Cayes Marine Reserve in Belize
This paper considers the role of a boundary organization in facilitating knowledge integration in the Gladden Spit and Silk Cayes Marine Reserve, a co-managed MPA in Belize

Summary

Introduction

Marine protected areas (MPAs) have proliferated in recent years, the result of a coordinated global conservation effort (Gray 2010). They are designed to meet a variety of ecological objectives, including the conservation, management, or restoration of species, fisheries, habitats, ecosystems, and/or ecological services, as well as social objectives such as the alleviation of poverty in coastal communities (Fox et al 2012). Marine protected areas (MPAs) have proliferated in recent years, the result of a coordinated global conservation effort (Gray 2010).. Marine protected areas (MPAs) have proliferated in recent years, the result of a coordinated global conservation effort (Gray 2010).1 They are designed to meet a variety of ecological objectives, including the conservation, management, or restoration of species, fisheries, habitats, ecosystems, and/or ecological services, as well as social objectives such as the alleviation of poverty in coastal communities (Fox et al 2012). Co-management has been identified as one effective approach to MPA governance (Rudd et al 2003; Jones 2006; Jones 2014), in part because it has the potential to enable the integration of multiple sources of knowledge (Singleton 2000; Wilson 2002; Moller et al 2004). In reviewing the MPA literature, Ferse et al (2010) argue that local ecological

Methods

Results

Conclusion