Abstract

Background: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and trichoepithelioma (TE) have some similarities clinically and histologically. The aim of this work is to evaluate the role of Bcl-2, CD10 and CD34 in differentiation between BCC and TE. Methods: The immunohistochemical expression of Bcl-2, CD10 and CD34 was evaluated in 20 BCCs and 12 TEs in a retrospective study. The localization of these markers in tumor and stromal cells was determined and comparison between BCC and TE was done. Immunohistochemistry for Bcl-2, CD10 and CD34 was performed on sections obtained from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded blocks. Bcl-2, CD10 and CD34 immunoreactivity in the stromal and/or tumor cells was determined as follows: negative (0); 1+ (10% - 50% positive cells); and 2+ (>50% positive cells). Results: In BCC (20 cases), the expression of Bcl-2 in stromal cells showed (0) immunoreactivity in 8 cases (40%), (1+) immunoreactivity in 7 cases (35%), and (2+) immunoreactivity in 5 cases (25%). Tumoral cells showed diffuse positivity in 20 out of 20 cases (100%), (1+) immunoreactivity in 5 cases (25%) and (2+) immunoreactivity in 15 cases (75%). On the other hand, the expression of Bcl2 in TE, 4 cases showed positive stromal cells out of 12 (33.33%), (1+) immunoreactivity in 2 cases (16.6%) and (2+) immunoreactivity in 2 cases (16.6%), and 8 cases showed no immunoreactivity. Tumoral cells showed positivity in 12 out of 12 cases (100%), (1+) immunoreactivity in 5 cases (41.6%), (2+) immunoreactivity in 7 cases (58.3%). In BCC cases, the expression of CD10 was noted in stromal cells in 8 out of 20 cases (40%), 5 cases showed positivity in stromal and basaloid cells and 3 cases showed positivity in stromal cells only, and 12 cases showed no immunoreactivity (60%). Tumor cells showed positivity in 11 cases out of 20 (55%), (1+) immunoreactivity in 6 cases (30%), (2+) in 5 cases (25%), and 9 cases showed no immunoreactivity (45%). On the other hand, the expression of CD10 in TE 7 cases showed positive stromal cells out of 12 (58.33%), (1+) immunoreactivity in 5 cases (41.6%) and (2+) in 2 cases (16.6%), and 5 cases showed no immunoreactivity (41.66%). Tumor cells showed positivity in 5 cases out of 12 (41.66%), (1+) immunoreactivity in 4 cases (33.33%) and (2+) in 1 case (8.3%), and 7 cases showed no immunoreactivity (58.33%). In BCC cases, the expression of CD34 was noted in stromal cells in14 cases out of 20 cases (70%), (1+) immunoreactivity in 10 cases (50%) and (2+) in 4 cases (20%), and 6 cases showed no immunoreactivity (30%). On the other hand, the expression of CD34 in TE, 10 cases showed positive stromal cells out of 12 (83.33%), (1+) immunoreactivity in 6 cases (50%) and (2+) in 4 cases (33.33%), and 2 cases showed no immunoreactivity (16.6%). Tumor cells showed no immunoreactivity for CD 34 in both BCC and trichoepithelioma, (100%) negative tumor cells. Significant difference of tumor\stromal cells immunoreactivity for Bcl-2 and CD34 in both BCC and TE but it was insignificant for CD10. Conclusion: We conclude that Bcl-2 CD10, CD34 are useful markers in the differential diagnosis of BCC versus TE.

Highlights

  • Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common cutaneous tumor, accounting for approximately 70% of all malignant diseases of the skin

  • CD10 may be useful for the differential diagnosis between benign tumors of cutaneous appendages originating from the hair follicle and BCC and it may solve a dilemma for the clinician and the pathologist, in small and superficial biopsies [4]

  • We examined 20 BCC and 12 TE for Bcl-2, CD10 and CD34 expression to see the immunostaining pattern of BCC and TE and if these makers might aid in the differentiation between the two tumors

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common cutaneous tumor, accounting for approximately 70% of all malignant diseases of the skin. It is locally aggressive and its metastasis is unusual [1]. CD10 may be useful for the differential diagnosis between benign tumors of cutaneous appendages originating from the hair follicle and BCC and it may solve a dilemma for the clinician and the pathologist, in small and superficial biopsies [4]. Methods: The immunohistochemical expression of Bcl-2, CD10 and CD34 was evaluated in 20 BCCs and 12 TEs in a retrospective study The localization of these markers in tumor and stromal cells was determined and comparison between BCC and TE was done. In BCC cases, the expression of CD34 was noted in stromal

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call