The Role of Authority in the Development of British Economics

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessThe Role of Authority in the Development of British EconomicsA. W. CoatsA. W. Coats Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Law and Economics Volume 7Oct., 1964 Sponsored by The University of Chicago Booth School of Business and The University of Chicago Law School Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/466602 Views: 5Total views on this site Citations: 13Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1966 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Gregory C. G. Moore, Helen Fordham The Victorian Effort to Exclude the Amateur ‘Public Intellectual’ from Economics: The Case of Stephen Versus Ruskin, History of Economics Review 66, no.11 (Apr 2017): 19–43.https://doi.org/10.1080/10370196.2017.1297181Nahid Aslanbeigui, Guy Oakes The British Tariff Reform Controversy and the Genesis of Pigou's Wealth and Welfare , 1903–12, History of Political Economy 47, no.suppl_1suppl_1 (Dec 2015): 23–48.https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-3130427Norikazu Takami The Sanguine Science: The Historical Contexts of A. C. Pigou’s Welfare Economics, History of Political Economy 46, no.33 (Sep 2014): 357–386.https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-2796185Nahid Aslanbeigui, Guy Oakes On Pigou’s Theory of Economic Policy Analysis, OEconomia 2012, no.0202 (Jul 2012): 123–150.https://doi.org/10.4074/S2113520712012017Nahid Aslanbeigui, Guy Oakes On Pigou’s Theory of Economic Policy Analysis, OEconomia , no.2-22-2 (Jun 2012): 123–150.https://doi.org/10.4000/oeconomia.1373Michel S. Zouboulakis Why do Evaluative Histories Matter after all?, Journal of the History of Economic Thought 23, no.33 (Jun 2009): 369–381.https://doi.org/10.1080/10427710120073645Roger E. Backhouse The fixation of economic beliefs, Journal of Economic Methodology 1, no.11 (Jul 1994): 33–42.https://doi.org/10.1080/13501789400000003Michael Watts Economists’ Ideological Conflicts and Consensus on Economic Issues, and their Implications for Economic Education, (Jan 1994): 47–64.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1382-3_4Warren J. Samuels The History of Economic Thought as Intellectual History, (Jan 1992): 37–55.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12263-9_3David Reisman Economics and Principles, (Jan 1990): 60–105.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11542-6_5J. E. King Economic Heresy as Deviant Science, (Jan 1988): 1–21.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07743-4_1Mike White Jevons’ Charge Of “The Noxious Influence Of Authority” : A Note, History of Economics Review 7, no.11 (May 2016): 20–29.https://doi.org/10.1080/10370196.1987.11733035JAMES P. HENDERSON THE WHEWELL GROUP OF MATHEMATICAL ECONOMISTS, The Manchester School 53, no.44 (Dec 1985): 404–431.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1985.tb00203.x