The role of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) in the follow-up of patients with precapillary pulmonary hypertension (PH)

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) interferes with L-arginine in the production of nitric oxide, a key mediator of endothelial cell function. ADMA is elevated in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and is associated with unfavorable outcomes. Aim To assess the role of ADMA to monitor disease progression of PH patients treated with PAH-specific therapy. Methods ADMA was measured by competitive ELISA at baseline (BL) and follow-up (FU). Risk assessment including a clinical assessment, echocardiography, 6-minute walking test, NT-pro-BNP and hemodynamic assessment by right heart catheterization was performed accordingly. Risk was calculated according to the ESC/ERS 2015 guidelines by the SPHAR method. Results ADMA samples were collected from 113 patients treated at our institution between 2012 and 2019. 89 (79%) patients had PAH, 15 (13%) were diagnosed with CTEPH and 9 (8%) with group 3 – PH associated with lung disease. 69% were females. 15 (13.3%) patients had a low risk at baseline, 96 (85%) intermediate risk and 2 (1.8%) were high risk patients. 75% received oral medications, 31% received subcutaneous treprostinil. Median baseline ADMA was 0.738umol/l. At BL no significant difference of ADMA plasma levels was found among the different PH types (p=0.063), or between different risk categories (p=0.531). Change in ADMA plasma levels correlated with change in risk (p=0.002, rs 0.291) and with change in mixed venous saturation (p=0.034, rs −0.205). Change in ADMA plasma levels also correlated with risk at FU (p=0.011, rs 0.240). Patients categorized as low risk at FU had a median ADMA plasma level decrease of 22%, compared with −3 to 0% ADMA plasma level change in patients with moderate to high risk at FU (p=0.04). Patients who improved their risk category had a median decrease of ADMA plasma level of 23% vs. 2.3% in patients who did not improve (p=0.011). Decrease of ADMA plasma levels was a weak but significant discriminator for improvement of risk in ROC analysis (p=0.032, AUC 0.374). Conclusion ADMA plasma levels paralleled the hemodynamic and clinical benefit of PAH-specific treatments in patients with precapillary PH. ADMA could be used as a biomarker for monitoring treatment effects in precapillary PH. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None