Abstract

Publisher Summary This chapter discusses the successes and failures of the Adaptation-level (AL) theory of stimulus generalization and provides an evaluation of its fruitfulness. The chapter describes the voluntary generalization experiments, which employs diverse stimulus dimensions such as lifted weight, wavelength, brightness, and line angle. Generally, the AL theory is extremely successful in predicting or interpreting the results of stimulus generalization experiments. With regard to the Central Tendency Effect, the central tendency shift occurs with reference to the psychological center (AL) of the generalization test series, which may not coincide with the physical center. In such cases, a shift of maximal responding from the training stimulus (TS) value may occur even when the test series is nominally symmetrical. In the choice paradigm, AL serves as the crossover point, such that stimuli above AL are to be responded to in one fashion and stimuli below AL are to be responded to in another. In the go/no-go situation, it appears that the TS are encoded not just with regard to their direction from, but also their distance from, the Prevailing AL.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.