Abstract
Synthetic soft tissue fillers frequently used to restore facial volume do not provide a regenerative framework, limiting their sustained efficacy. Autologous fat transfer for facial rejuvenation supports tissue regeneration but has unpredictable outcomes depending on the quality of harvesting, processing, and implantation. Exploration of the pros and cons of available tissue fillers and the role of an injectable Allograft Adipose Matrix (AAM) for facial rejuvenation. The results of a literature review conducted by two clinicians with extensive experience in this field were discussed by a panel of dermatologists and surgeons who regularly treat patients with signs and symptoms of facial aging. A manuscript was prepared and reviewed by the panel taking into account the evidence and their clinical experience treating patients for facial rejuvenation. Facial rejuvenation needs to address the volume deficiency and repositioning of ptotic soft tissues. Frequently used synthetic fillers are suitable candidates for improving the facial appearance of fine lines and for molding. A better understanding of facial volume loss has allowed the use of adipose fat cells for facial rejuvenation. The injectable AAM is readily available and provides a regenerative framework for sustainable results. Prospective clinical and randomized studies support the effective and safe use of AAM for facial rejuvenation. AAM may offer an alternative to synthetic fillers and autologous fat implantation in the face without the cumbersome process of fat harvesting and processing. More robust studies are to confirm the positive results obtained in smaller studies using the soft tissue bio stimulatory injectable.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have