Abstract
BackgroundThree-dimensional (3D) printing is an emerging technology widely used in medical education. However, its role in the teaching of human anatomy needs further evaluation.MethodsPubMed, Embase, EBSCO, SpringerLink, and Nature databases were searched systematically for studies published from January 2011 to April 2020 in the English language. GRADEprofiler software was used to evaluate the quality of literature. In this study, a meta-analysis of continuous and binary data was conducted. Both descriptive and statistical analyses were used.ResultsComparing the post-training tests in neuroanatomy, cardiac anatomy, and abdominal anatomy, the standardized mean difference (SMD) of the 3D group and the conventional group were 1.27, 0.37, and 2.01, respectively (p < 0.05). For 3D vs. cadaver and 3D vs. 2D, the SMD were 0.69 and 1.05, respectively (p < 0.05). For answering time, the SMD of the 3D group vs. conventional group was – 0.61 (P < 0.05). For 3D print usefulness, RR = 2.29(P < 0.05). Five of the six studies showed that satisfaction of the 3D group was higher than that of the conventional group. Two studies showed that accuracy of answering questions in the 3D group was higher than that in the conventional group.ConclusionsCompared with students in the conventional group, those in the 3D printing group had advantages in accuracy and answering time. In the test of anatomical knowledge, the test results of students in the 3D group were not inferior (higher or equal) to those in the conventional group. The post-training test results of the 3D group were higher than those in the cadaver or 2D group. More students in the 3D printing group were satisfied with their learning compared with the conventional group. The results could be influenced by the quality of the randomized controlled trials. In a framework of ethical rigor, the application of the 3D printing model in human anatomy teaching is expected to grow further.
Highlights
Three-dimensional (3D) printing is an emerging technology widely used in medical education
The results showed a significant difference between the two groups (SMD: 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.82–1.72, P < 0.001; Fig. 1)
The results showed that the 3D group was superior to the control group in terms of test scores, accuracy, and student satisfaction, when the literature quality was assessed at a high or moderate quality level (Table S1)
Summary
Three-dimensional (3D) printing is an emerging technology widely used in medical education. Three-dimensional (3D) printing ( known as additive manufacturing) is a process in which a 3D computer model is transformed into a physical object [1]. The “printed materials” are stacked layer by layer, until the physical object matches the blueprint on the computer. The future of 3D printing seems to involve printing more realistic models using different materials [4]. Compared with other tissue engineering scaffolds and rapid prototyping technology, 3D printing has the following advantages: high accuracy, good integration, fast reconstruction, and low cost [5]. 3D printing models can make it easy for people to understand complex physical structures and print models that are difficult to obtain [6]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
