The role of α-lipoic acid in the treatment of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease against the background of type 2 diabetes mellitus

Abstract

Objective — to study the role of α‑lipoic acid (ALA) in the treatment of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in combination with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
 Materials and methods. The study involved 120 subjects, who were divided into four groups: 1st group included 60 patients with GERD against the background of T2DM, 2nd group consisted of 20 patients with GERD and 3rd group included 20 patients with isolated T2DM. Additionally, the 1st group was divided into 2 subgroups: 25 patients receiving standard treatment and 29 patients receiving standard treatment + ALA supplementation. The control group consisted of 20 practically healthy age‑matching subjects. Ghrelin and leptin levels were determined by enzyme‑linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) on the analyzer «Labline‑90» (Austria).
 Results. The comparison of the standard treatment regimen and proposed treatment demonstrated significantly lower frequency of such symptoms as epigastric pain, regurgitation and symptoms, specific for ischemic heart disease, in the subgroup with the proposed treatment regimen (p <0.05). Investigation of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in a subgroup of patients receiving standard treatment, showed improvements in all parameters, but significant (p <0.05) improvement in patients on the standard therapy was recorded in glucose, insulin, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C) levels, and insulin resistance index (HOMA‑IR). In the subgroup receiving ALA, improvement was gained in the indices of glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, HOMA‑IR, triglycerides, cholesterol, high and very low‑density lipoproteins and atherogenicity coefficient. After the treatment in the subgroups of standard therapy and therapy with the ALA addition, an increase in ghrelin levels was registered from 0.99±0.41 to 1.09±0.45 ng/ml and from 0.93±0.52 to 1.22±0.59 ng/ml, respectively, and decrease in leptin levels from 19.04±9.48 to 16.66±7.14 ng/ml and from 20.75±9.09 to 16.39±6.88 ng/ml. However, in the first subgroup, the difference between the indicators before and after treatment did not reach the level of statistical significance (p=0.421 and p=0.320, respectively), while in the subgroup where ALA was used, the difference was significant (p <0.05).
 Conclusions. It has been established that ALA positively influences on the state of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, improving these parameters. The addition of ALA to the standard treatment for GERD against the background of type 2 diabetes showed significant improvement in the studied parameters. Since reference values for ghrelin and leptin levels have not been established yet, it can be assumed that increase in ghrelin and decrease in leptin levels against the background of decrease in well‑studied parameters of lipid and carbohydrate metabolism, have a positive impact on the clinical manifestation of GERD against T2DM background. This assumption may be used as a marker for effective treatment of GERD in combination with T2DM.