Abstract

That cancer cells show patterns of metabolism different from normal cells has been known for over 50 years. Yet, it is only in the past decade or so that an appreciation of the benefits of these changes has begun to emerge. Altered cancer cell metabolism was initially attributed to defective mitochondria. However, we now realize that most cancers do not have mitochondrial mutations and that normal cells can transiently adopt cancer-like metabolism during periods of rapid proliferation. Indeed, an encompassing, albeit somewhat simplified, conceptual framework to explain both normal and cancer cell metabolism rests on several simple premises. First, the metabolic pathways used by cancer cells and their normal counterparts are the same. Second, normal quiescent cells use their metabolic pathways and the energy they generate largely to maintain cellular health and organelle turnover and, in some cases, to provide secreted products necessary for the survival of the intact organism. By contrast, undifferentiated cancer cells minimize the latter functions and devote their energy to producing the anabolic substrates necessary to maintain high rates of unremitting cellular proliferation. Third, as a result of the uncontrolled proliferation of cancer cells, a larger fraction of the metabolic intermediates normally used by quiescent cells purely as a source of energy are instead channeled into competing proliferation-focused and energy-consuming anabolic pathways. Fourth, cancer cell clones with the most plastic and rapidly adaptable metabolism will eventually outcompete their less well-adapted brethren during tumor progression and evolution. This attribute becomes increasingly important as tumors grow and as their individual cells compete in a constantly changing and inimical environment marked by nutrient, oxygen, and growth factor deficits. Here, we review some of the metabolic pathways whose importance has gained center stage for tumor growth, particularly those under the control of the c-Myc (Myc) oncoprotein. We discuss how these pathways differ functionally between quiescent and proliferating normal cells, how they are kidnapped and corrupted during the course of transformation, and consider potential therapeutic strategies that take advantage of common features of neoplastic and metabolic disorders.

Highlights

  • Specialty section: This article was submitted to Cancer Endocrinology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Endocrinology

  • We realize that most cancers do not have mitochondrial mutations and that normal cells can transiently adopt cancer-like metabolism during periods of rapid proliferation

  • TCA cycle intermediates such as citrate, succinyl coenzyme A (CoA), and oxaloacetate may be used in non-mitochondrial biosynthetic pathways to furnish additional anabolic substrates for lipid, amino acid, and nucleotide biosynthesis, respectively

Read more

Summary

THE ABNORMAL METABOLISM OF

The distinct metabolic behaviors of cancer cells have been appreciated since the 1950s when Otto Warburg first observed their high rates of glycolysis even when there was sufficient oxygen present to support OXPHOS [1,2,3,4]. To further understand the role of endogenous Myc in maintaining basal rates of glycolysis and OXPHOS in transformed cells, Graves et al [158] utilized the conditional, doxycyclineregulatable expression of a short hairpin RNA directed against Myc to silence the oncoprotein’s expression in A549 human small cell lung cancer cells, which normally express high levels of Myc. Conforming to the findings in the above-discussed rat fibroblast studies, the knockdown of Myc was associated with marked growth inhibition, a flattened cellular morphology, reduced mitochondrial mass, and the collapse of ΔΨM. Because the high-level re-expression of Myc greatly increased glycolysis, it was surmised that this failure to entirely normalize ETC structure and function was due to a combination of factors including structural changes to the mitochondria and their cristae, differences in the relative contribution of glycolysis and OXPHOS to the energy landscape, subtle nuances relating to the control of Myc protein expression, and differential cellular growth rates and their resulting anabolic requirements [158]. The PKM2 isoform was less highly induced in myc−/− T-cells

THE ROLE OF GLUTAMINOLYSIS IN METABOLIC REPROGRAMMING
METABOLIC LINKS BETWEEN NORMAL AND NEOPLASTIC STATES
Findings
THERAPEUTIC STRATEGIES AIMED AT TARGETING MYC AND ITS EFFECTORS

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.