Abstract

Rohingya refugees, a group of religious and ethnic minorities, primarily reside in the South Asian nations. With decades of displacement, forced migration, limited freedom of movement, violence and oppression, they have been termed by the United Nations (UN) as the 'most persecuted minority group' in world history. Literature shows an increased prevalence of psychiatric disorders such as depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress, insomnia, etc., in this population. However, beyond 'medicalisation', the psychosocial challenges of the Rohingyas need to be understood through the lens of 'social suffering', which results from a complex interplay of multiple social, political, environmental and geographical factors. Lack of essential living amenities, poverty, unemployment, overcrowding, compromised social identity, and persistent traumatic stressors lead to inequality, restricted healthcare access, human rights deprivation and social injustice in this group. Even though the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) has taken a renewed interest in Rohingya re-establishment with well-researched standards of care, there are several pragmatic challenges in their implementation and inclusion in policies. This paper reviews these multi-dimensional psychosocial challenges of the Rohingyas by synthesising various intersecting conceptual models including minority stress, health-stigma-discrimination framework, refugee ecological model and capability approach. Furthermore, it highlights multidisciplinary interventions to mitigate these adversities, improve their living situation and eventually foster healing via means which are culturally relevant and contextually appropriate. These interventions need to involve various stakeholders from a human rights and dignity based lens, including the voices of the Rohingyas and supported by more research in this area.

Highlights

  • The United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) defines refugees as ‘people who have fled war, violence, conflict or persecution and have crossed an international border to find safety in another country’ (UNHCR, n.d.-a)

  • Rohingyas face a similar situation, compounded by compromised healthcare access, political violence and societal apathy (MacLean, 2019). Their socio-cultural peculiarities have specific ‘idioms of distress’ which vary in expression and are frequently unrecognised by mental health professionals (MHP) from outside their communities (Elshazly et al, 2019)

  • Consequent to that, interventions can be tailored in each of the sub-systems (Fig. 1), ex: support and psychotherapy, family decisionmaking and community support groups, languagesupport, involvement of media, skill development and stigmaprotection programmes, and national and international rehabilitation-promoting and refugee-inclusive legislations. Many of these principles are included in the Mental Health and Psychosocial Services’ (MHPSS), but further research and implementation in the Rohingya population remain as a test of time

Read more

Summary

Policy and Systems Review

Cite this article: Sudheer N, Banerjee D (2021). The Rohingya refugees: a conceptual framework of their psychosocial adversities, cultural idioms of distress and social suffering.

Marginalisation and human rights crisis in the Rohingyas
Body Brain functions
Violence Traumatic events Idioms of distress
Ecological model of refugee distress
Revisiting the existing service provisions
The Indian scenario
Gaps in research
Targeted psychosocial
Findings
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.