Year-end Sale % OFF 
Abstract
This study evaluates the robustness of multisample confirmatory factor analysis approaches to measurement equivalence/invariance (ME/I) evaluations under a specific model misspecification: when independence among the groups is assumed, but groups are dependent. Monte Carlo simulation is used to investigate the robustness of several ME/I evaluation procedures including the likelihood ratio test (), ΔCFI, ΔSRMR, and ΔRMSEA. The effect of this model misspecification on the factor loadings and their standard errors is also considered. Assuming the groups are independent when they are not is shown to have no practical effect on the results of the , ΔCFI, ΔSRMR, or ΔRMSEA procedures because the effect of model misspecification is canceled out through differencing. Similarly, the estimated factor loadings and standard errors are not significantly affected by incorrectly assuming among-group dependence. These results are used to develop recommendations for researchers who conduct multigroup analyses using structural equation models with samples in which independence is unclear.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
