Abstract

A series of landmark studies have provided conclusive evidence that the early administration of food allergens dramatically prevents the emergence of food allergy. One of the greatest remaining challenges is whether patients with established food allergy can return to health. This challenge is particularly pressing in the case of allergies against peanut, tree nuts, fish, and shellfish which are lifelong in most patients and may elicit severe reactions. The standard of care for food allergy is allergen avoidance and the timely administration of epinephrine upon accidental exposure. Epinephrine, and other therapeutic options like antihistamines provide acute symptom relief but do not target the underlying pathology of the disease. In principle, any transformative treatment for established food allergy would require the restoration of a homeostatic immunological state. This may be attained through either an active, non-harmful immune response (immunological tolerance) or a lack of a harmful immune response (e.g., anergy), such that subsequent exposures to the allergen do not elicit a clinical reaction. Importantly, such a state must persist beyond the course of the treatment and exert its protective effects permanently. In this review, we will discuss the immunological mechanisms that maintain lifelong food allergies and are, consequently, those which must be dismantled or reprogrammed to instate a clinically non-reactive state. Arguably, the restoration of such a state in the context of an established food allergy would require a reprogramming of the immune response against a given food allergen. We will discuss existing and experimental therapeutic strategies to eliminate IgE reactivity and, lastly, will propose outstanding questions to pave the road to the development of novel, transformative therapeutics in food allergy.

Highlights

  • Thirty-two million Americans over the age 18 suffer from food allergies, amounting to approximately 11% of the population, and a similar prevalence exists in other developed countries [1,2,3]

  • The standard of care for food allergy is allergen avoidance, oral immunotherapy (OIT) for peanut (PN) has Transformative Treatments for Food Allergy been approved by the FDA in the United States [7]

  • The mechanisms of homeostatic disruption which underly allergic sensitization have been thoroughly reviewed elsewhere [11]. This breach of homeostasis leads to the differentiation of allergen-specific CD4+ Th2 cells, T follicular helper (Tfh) cells, short-lived plasma cells, and memory B cells (MBCs), all of which contribute to IgE generation and clinically active food allergy [12, 13]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Thirty-two million Americans over the age 18 suffer from food allergies, amounting to approximately 11% of the population, and a similar prevalence exists in other developed countries [1,2,3]. This breach of homeostasis leads to the differentiation of allergen-specific CD4+ Th2 cells, T follicular helper (Tfh) cells, short-lived plasma cells, and memory B cells (MBCs), all of which contribute to IgE generation and clinically active food allergy [12, 13]. Evidence for a role of long-lived plasma cells replenishing these IgE titres, and in the persistence of food allergy has long been disputed [12, 17].

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call