The Riverine Productivity Model: An Heuristic View of Carbon Sources and Organic Processing in Large River Ecosystems

Abstract

Our current views of the structure and function of large river ecosystems are based primarily on three influential and still valuable riverine models: (1) the river continuum concept, or RCC (e.g., Vannote et al. 1980); (2) the serial discontinuity concept (Ward and Stanford 1983), which integrated the effects of large dams and reservoirs on the RCC; and (3) the flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems (Junk et al. 1989) and its relationship to the RCC (Sedell et al. 1989). With regard to food webs in large rivers, these models accentuated the importance of nutrients derived from either headwater streams or seasonal floodplain pulses and downplayed or virtually ignored the role of local instream primary production and riparian litterfall. We believe that the general portrayal of ecosystem function within large rivers needs substantial revision because previous models relied too heavily on data from either lower-order streams, floodplain rivers (thereby exluding large rivers with constricted channels), or main channel habitats with their dominant collector feeding guild (thus de-emphasizing nearshore areas where species in many feeding guilds congregate). We propose an alternative hypothesis the riverine productivity model (RPM) which stresses the varying importance to large river food webs of local autochthonous production and direct organic inputs from the riparian zone. The RPM's portrayal of ecosystem function differs most significantly from that of previous models for rivers characterized by constricted channels, such as the upper two-thirds of the Ohio River.