Abstract
The European Commission has initiated the process of changing how exclusionary abuses of dominance are evaluated, moving towards a more ‘form-based’ approach compared to the current ‘effects-based’ approach. This article explains that, if not implemented correctly, its planned approach risks worsening consumer outcomes. This article outlines the Commission’s existing approach to taking enforcement action against exclusionary abuses, and the two actions taken by the Commission to develop this approach. Then, it explores three cases where the false positives that arise from a form-based approach, rather than an effects-based approach, risk worsening outcomes for consumers. It suggests that, while an effects-based approach has its limitations, the Commission should ensure that it does not err too far into adopting a completely form-based approach as it develops updated rules on exclusionary abuses.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.