The risk of thromboembolism and hemorrhage following mitral valve replacement: A comparative analysis between the porcine xenograft valve and Ionescu-Shiley bovine pericardial valve

Abstract

To ascertain the risk of thromboembolism and anticoagulant-related hemorrhage following mitral valve replacement with bioprostheses, an 8 year retrospective study between two groups of patients was analyzed. Group I included 206 patients undergoing mitral valve replacement with porcine xenograft valves. They were placed on a regimen of long-term oral anticoagulation (greater than 8 weeks, mean 6 months). Follow-up was 524.3 patient-years, mean 30.5 months. There were 24 thromboembolic events (4.6% per patient-year), four of which were fatal. Actuarially, 80.7% +/- 4.3% are free of thromboembolism at 8 years. There were 12 instances of major bleeding episodes, for a linearized incidence of 2.5% per patient-year; two were fatal. Group II included 322 patients undergoing mitral valve replacement with a bovine pericardial valve. They were placed on a program of short-term anticoagulation (6 weeks only). Follow-up was 1,106 patient-years, mean 46.4 months. There were four thromboembolic episodes (none fatal), an incidence of 0.36% per patient-year. Seven bleeding episodes occurred, 0.63% per patient-year; none was fatal. The difference between the groups reached statistical significance (p less than 0.001). The low risk of thromboembolism with the bovine pericardial valve appears to be due to its superior hydraulic characteristics. Use of this valve allows mitral valve replacement without long-term oral anticoagulation and the associated risk of anticoagulant-related hemorrhage.