Abstract
Examples of repeat appointments have appeared in case law since the launch of the IBA Guidelines in 2004 created some debate. To date, this has not triggered any proposed responses. This article argues that ‘repeated appointments’ and ‘repeat arbitrators’ require more attention and, to begin with, proper definitions. The lack of comprehensive definitions reveals that this area is relatively unresearched and, as a consequence, there is little guidance for arbitrators or awareness by parties as regards the disclosure requirements in circumstances of repetition. Providing a definition, highlighting the issues surrounding this area and providing some suggestions, in an era of transparency in international commercial arbitration, are thus the main purposes of this article.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
