Abstract
Some agents representing the ‘receiving end’ of the medical-industrial complex could be called ‘career consumers.’ We identify these consucrats as a new class of intersectional representation of ‘those affected’ in healthcare delivery systems. We describe them in the context of (similar) abocrats and femocrats but show that consucrats face more complex and different level intersectional challenges. The designation, professionalization, and representation of consucrats are problematic, in particular for public policy change. We argue for an enhanced strategic and cautious role for the consumer health movement to support consucrats.
Highlights
The Rhetoric of Consumer Representation A strongly held belief that consumers need to be represented in health decision-making has become pervasive ever since the silent revolutions of the post-World War II era
An exceedingly clinical focus on a particular disease category stands in the way of efforts that would focus on a health policy that addresses the ‘upstream,’ ‘distal,’ political, social and commercial causes of the causes of ill health in populations
Consumer health advocates become complicit in extenuating the perverse effects of the medical-industrial complex
Summary
The Rhetoric of Consumer Representation A strongly held belief that consumers need to be represented in health decision-making has become pervasive ever since the silent revolutions of the post-World War II era. These representatives are designated as individuals, the literature increasingly demands community consumer voices.[4] It appears that only occasionally systems and public policy views (eg, institutional design or finance parameters) are considered.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have