Abstract
This commentary considers the test laid down by the court regarding the proper procedure to be followed if a care order based on the child remaining at home is to be changed, and the circumstances in which a child could be removed pending such a change. The significance of Re B-S and the procedural requirements of Art 8 ECHR in such circumstances are considered, and the implications for future proceedings explored.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
