Abstract

The use of pre-packs as a restructuring tool has been traditionally popular in the United Kingdom and the United States. In recent years, however, several jurisdictions around the world, including Singapore, India, Spain, the Netherlands, and the Philippines have promoted the use of pre-packs. By shortening the length of insolvency proceedings, pre-packs have the ability to reduce the costs of financial distress, and especially those associated with the loss of reputation, employees, suppliers and goodwill. Thus, pre-packs can help maximise the value of the firm for the benefit of debtors, creditors and society as a whole. However, the conflict of interests, lack of transparency and various forms of opportunistic behaviour potentially existing in pre-packs have raised some concerns about the desirability of this restructuring tool. This article analyses the concept and types of pre-packs generally found around the world, as well as their similarities and international divergences. It will also review the empirical evidence on pre-packs with the purpose of getting a better understanding of the actual features, risks and outcomes of this restructuring tool. It will conclude by discussing whether countries should promote the use of pre-packs and, if so, how this mechanism can be adopted to serve as an efficient restructuring tool while providing an effective protection to creditors.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.