Abstract
This article traces the shift toward illiberalism in the National Review on the topic of immigration and nationhood. At the height of the fusion movement at National Review, the journal espoused a compromise view on immigration, hence the relatively muted debates on immigration and the concept of nationhood. The past three decades, however, have been punctuated by fierce and increasingly radical disagreements among conservative intellectuals in the pages of National Review on the question of immigration and nationhood. This study traces the development of these debates across 70 years of the National Review to demonstrate the trajectory of illiberal views toward immigration and regarding the concept of nationhood within the fusion.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
