Abstract
Miranda, Torres and Ruiz (1998) and Finger (1993) have documented the increased incidence of anti‐dumping in recent years and its spread beyond developed to developing and transitional economies. The countries that have been the most prolific in launching anti‐dumping cases have largely been members of discriminatory trading arrangements such as NAFTA while the affected (accused) countries have often been outside regional trading blocs. This study documents and analyses the asymmetry in anti‐dumping actions, focusing on the propensity of members of regional trading blocs to use anti‐dumping actions against developing countries in East Asia.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
