Abstract
Miranda, Torres and Ruiz (1998) and Finger (1993) have documented the increased incidence of anti‐dumping in recent years and its spread beyond developed to developing and transitional economies. The countries that have been the most prolific in launching anti‐dumping cases have largely been members of discriminatory trading arrangements such as NAFTA while the affected (accused) countries have often been outside regional trading blocs. This study documents and analyses the asymmetry in anti‐dumping actions, focusing on the propensity of members of regional trading blocs to use anti‐dumping actions against developing countries in East Asia.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Paper version not known
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
