Abstract
There are different pronouns available to express third person plural subjects in Dutch which differ in several aspects. One of these pronouns, hun ‘them’, was originally an object form, and can thus be considered a quirky subject. Therefore, there is an alternation between two third person pronouns, one of which is in the nominative case and the other in the accusative/dative. This can be characterized as differential subject marking. The question then arises what triggers the alternation. I will argue that the successful rise of the object pronoun as a subject in Dutch can be attributed to an important property of this personal pronoun: it exclusively refers to animate individuals. Purely animacy-based differential subject marking is rare from a cross-linguistic perspective. In order to explain how this special type of differential subject marking came about in Dutch, it is compared with the alternation it originated from: a case of differential object marking in Dutch.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
