Abstract

Recently there has been considerable interest in the problem of finding a phylogenetic network with a minimum number of reticulation vertices which displays a given set of phylogenetic trees, that is, a network with minimum hybrid number. Such networks are useful for representing the evolution of species whose genomes have undergone processes such as lateral gene transfer and recombination that cannot be represented appropriately by a phylogenetic tree. Even so, as was recently pointed out in the literature, insisting that a network displays the set of trees can be an overly restrictive assumption when modeling certain evolutionary phenomena such as incomplete lineage sorting. In this paper, we thus consider the less restrictive notion of rigidly displaying which we introduce and study here. More specifically, we characterize when two trees can be rigidly displayed by a certain type of phylogenetic network called a temporal tree-child network in terms of fork-picking sequences. These are sequences of special subconfigurations of the two trees related to the well-studied cherry-picking sequences. We also show that, in case it exists, the rigid hybrid number for two phylogenetic trees is given by a minimum weight fork-picking sequence for the trees. Finally, we consider the relationship between the rigid hybrid number and three closely related numbers; the weak, beaded, and temporal hybrid numbers. In particular, we show that these numbers can all be different even for a fixed pair of trees, and also present an infinite family of pairs of trees which demonstrates that the difference between the rigid hybrid number and the temporal-hybrid number for two phylogenetic trees on the same set of n leaves can grow at least linearly with n.

Highlights

  • There has been great interest in using phylogenetic networks to model processes such as lateral gene transfer and recombination

  • Proof (ii) ⇒ (i) If two phylogenetic trees are displayed by a phylogenetic network they are rigidly displayed by that network. (iii) ⇒ (ii) Apply (Humphries et al 2013a, Theorem 1), which states that two phylogenetic trees are displayed by a temporal tree-child network if and only if there is a cherry-picking sequence for them. (i) ⇒ (iv) Apply Proposition 2. (iv) ⇒ (iii) Apply the observation stated before the statement of the corollary i. e. , that a fork-picking sequence gives rise to a cherry-picking sequence

  • Motivated by the fact that in some evolutionary scenarios the notion of a network displaying two phylogenetic trees might be too restrictive, we have introduced and studied the concept of a network rigidly displaying a pair of phylogenetic trees

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There has been great interest in using phylogenetic networks to model processes such as lateral gene transfer and recombination (see e.g. Bapteste et al 2013). We focus on the special situation where two phylogenetic trees T and T are weakly displayed by a temporal tree-child network under the assumption that there exist simultaneous embeddings of both trees that do not permit more than three branches of T and T to come together at a reticulation vertex. In this case we shall say that T and T are rigidly displayed by the network (see Fig. 1 for an example).

40 Page 4 of 29
Preliminaries
Weakly displaying two trees in a network
40 Page 8 of 29
40 Page 10 of 29
Rigidly displaying two trees in a network
Fork operations
40 Page 14 of 29
40 Page 16 of 29
Fork-picking sequences
40 Page 18 of 29
The rigid hybrid number of two trees
40 Page 20 of 29
The temporal hybrid number
40 Page 22 of 29
The weak and beaded hybrid numbers
40 Page 24 of 29
Discussion
40 Page 26 of 29
40 Page 28 of 29
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call