Abstract
The paper deals with the rights of society to the truth and the memory of serious violations of human rights during authoritarian regimes. To do so, use the legal parameters of transitional justice established by the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. It directs the analysis to a comparison between the experiences of commissions of truth and memory in Brazil and Chile, observing its positive and negative points, from the established objectives of favoring the consolidation of a democratic rule of law where the knowledge and memory of the truth can avoid new authoritarian regimes.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
