Abstract

A comprehensive review of the psychiatric patient's right to refuse treatment is presented and compared to a right to treatment. Involuntary psychiatric patients are still denied an adequate right to refuse treatment based largely on their involuntary status. An argument is presented which explores the lack of a rational basis for this denial based on the involuntary v. voluntary status classification as used in the New York State Mental Hygiene Law and the New York State Department of Mental Hygiene's regulations. This would be in violation of the equal protection and due process clauses of the 14th amendment. A more strict view of the right to refuse treatment which could only be denied by a judicial decree of incompetency would promote a better therapeutic alliance that will be in the patient's interest.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.