Abstract

The revolt of the urban ghettos in the mid-1960's was in large part the consequence of a dichotomy in the think ing of Caucasians regarding the city. Accepting the city as a source of work but rejecting it as a desirable place to live, whites moved out to the suburbs and left the inner city to the underclasses. The minority groups, on the other hand, ini tially sought socioeconomic salvation within the city; it was, in the words of biographer Claude Brown, the "Promised Land." Instead, the ethnic groups suffered confinement to the ghettos and restricted opportunities within the city. The ghetto enclave produced a consciousness of experience among its residents, of which a sense of entrapment was an integral aspect. The more than one hundred major riots which ensued between 1964 and 1967 were spontaneous outbursts of hostility toward ghetto conditions and toward those who perpetuated the environment. A high level of support, demonstrated in both attitude and action, prevailed during the revolts. Significantly, the two institutions which represented the white establishment, the police and businesses, were singled out for attack. Largely ignored were libraries, schools, and civic buildings. The riots were thus the result of an ecological malaise in American soci ety which had prevailed for decades prior to the assaults of the ghettos in the 1960's.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.