Abstract

In this report, we tried to evaluate the merits of the classic "reconstructive ladder" and other reconstructive tools, such as acute shortening followed by distraction osteogenesis and a vacuum-assisted closure device, for the treatment of high-energy injuries. Thirty-seven patients suffering from high-velocity injuries to the extremities caused by war weapons and blast terror attacks were treated at our institution. The fractures were initially stabilized by the Association for the Study of Internal Fixation (AO/ASIF) unilateral tubular external fixator, which was changed 2-3 days later to a circular Ilizarov frame for 19 patients. Temporary acute shortening was performed for 5 patients. Skin grafts were performed for 21 patients, local or regional flaps for 14 patients, and free flaps for 6. Vacuum-assisted closure was selected for 8 patients. The wounds were successfully closed in all the patients. Two patients with upper-limb injuries had nonunion. Motor nerve injuries recovered in 7/10 patients. Due to hypergranulating tissue, 2 patients treated with vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) had to stop treatment early. Their wounds were closed with skin graft or local flap. The classic reconstructive ladder, starting from direct closure and ending with a free flap, should be extended for limb traumas and include acute shortening with or without angulation, followed by distraction osteogenesis and the VAC system on the same step as the free flap.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call