Abstract
This paper analyzes a family of rules for bankruptcy problems that generalizes the so-called reverse Talmud rule and encompasses both the constrained equal-awards rule and the constrained equal-losses rule. The family, introduced by van den Brink et al., [Characterization of the reverse Talmud bankruptcy rule by exemption and exclusion properties, European Journal of Operational Research 228 (2013), 413-417], is a counterpart to the so-called TAL-family of rules, introduced and studied by Moreno-Ternero and Villar [The TAL-family of rules for bankruptcy problems, Social Choice and Welfare 27 (2006) 231-249], and it is included within the so-called CIC-family of rules introduced by Thomson [Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims, Social Choice and Welfare 31 (2008) 667-692]. We provide a systematic study of the structural properties of the rules within the family, as well as its connections with the existing related literature.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
