Abstract

This paper analyzes a family of rules for bankruptcy problems that generalizes the so-called reverse Talmud rule and encompasses both the constrained equal-awards rule and the constrained equal-losses rule. The family, introduced by van den Brink et al., [Characterization of the reverse Talmud bankruptcy rule by exemption and exclusion properties, European Journal of Operational Research 228 (2013), 413-417], is a counterpart to the so-called TAL-family of rules, introduced and studied by Moreno-Ternero and Villar [The TAL-family of rules for bankruptcy problems, Social Choice and Welfare 27 (2006) 231-249], and it is included within the so-called CIC-family of rules introduced by Thomson [Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims, Social Choice and Welfare 31 (2008) 667-692]. We provide a systematic study of the structural properties of the rules within the family, as well as its connections with the existing related literature.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call