Abstract
This article provides a reassessment from the perspective of folklore studies of the natural history section of Samuel Peters’s General History of Connecticut (1781). Peters was an Anglican priest and Loyalist who fled the Colony of Connecticut for London prior to the American Revolution. His General History has long been disparaged in the United States as propaganda and falsehood, including his report on the animals of Connecticut. Still others have regarded him as a ‘Munchausen’ or inventor of fantastical creatures. This article examines the entirety of the natural history section to argue that Peters was both sincere in his attempt to describe the animals and actively recorded local folklore concerning them.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
