Abstract

Chinese academic journals in the humanities and social sciences have developed rapidly in recent years, but behind the increase in number, the environment of journals and the improvement of the quality of papers still have a long way to go. South Korea, which is also within the East Asian cultural circle, its modern academic research started almost at the same time as China. The academic environment of the two countries is similar. The development level of academic journals is not too high in the international view. However, in recent years, the Korean government and all walks of life Under the joint efforts, the academic journal circle in South Korea has formed a relatively standardized development environment, and has promoted the sound development of the overall academic ecology of South Korea. From this point of view, the development model of Korean academic journals has important reference significance for our country. This article takes the academic journals of Chinese language and literature in South Korea as an example. It analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the construction of Korean journals from two aspects of operation details and related journal institution, and based on this, it puts forward five major recommendations to the Chinese human and social journals, including establishing a dedicated academic journal management funding agency and a unified journal evaluation system, increasing the number of “core journals”, changing evaluation concepts, relaxing the conditions for running journals, and increasing professional journals Proportion, respect for the characteristics of disciplines, improve evaluation methods, encourage the entry of social resources, etc.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call