Abstract

Abstract Citizens’ exit polls are performed by local voters to verify the official reported election results. Five citizens’ exit polls were run in southeast Kansas during the Nov 8th 2016 election. These exit polls were designed specifically to verify computer generated vote counts and run solely by volunteer labor, all local citizens who were willing to put in the necessary hours on Election Day to conduct the poll and later, to count the results by hand. These exit polls were able to obtain high participation rates resulting in the ability to detect small yet statistically significant differences. All five polling stations surveyed show evidence of multiple statistical anomalies in both the pattern and size of the errors between the official results and exit poll results although biases were not uniformly oriented across sites. The small discrepancies found in the studied races were insufficient to alter the outcomes. Non-response bias and unintentional errors were evaluated as potential causes; those explanations were plausible in some but not all cases. These results show a pattern of discrepancies between the exit polls and computer counted results displaying consistent bias within sites. This would be an expected outcome of a deliberate manipulation of the computer results. While this data doesn’t conclusively prove election interference and manipulation of votes counts, it should be taken seriously as a sign of such interference. Doubts about the accuracy of the reported results are appropriate unless other plausible explanations for the discrepancies can be found.

Highlights

  • In order for citizens to feel confident in the machine counts reported as the official results, they must be transparently accurate

  • Five citizens’ exit polls were run in southeast Kansas during the Nov 8th 2016 election. These exit polls were designed to verify computer generated vote counts and run solely by volunteer labor, all local citizens who were willing to put in the necessary hours on Election Day to conduct the poll and later, to count the results by hand

  • These results show a pattern of discrepancies between the exit polls and computer counted results displaying consistent bias within sites

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In order for citizens to feel confident in the machine counts reported as the official results, they must be transparently accurate. Lacking confidence in the vote counting process, to independently verify the accuracy of the official reported machine counts, five voter-organized exit polls were conducted in three counties in southeast Kansas on Nov. 8th, 2016. These exit polls were designed to verify computer generated vote counts and run solely by volunteer labor, all local citizens who were willing to put in the necessary hours on Election Day to conduct the poll and later, to count the results by hand. The volunteers conducting the exit poll identified across the spectrum of political parties and beliefs, sharing only a strong belief in the need for honest accurate election results and discontent with a voting process that lacks sufficient transparency to feel confident in the reported outcomes

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call