Abstract
AbstractThis introduction to the roundtable “The Responsibility to Protect in a Changing World Order: Twenty Years since Its Inception” argues that the geostrategic configuration that made the responsibility to protect (RtoP) possible has changed beyond recognition in the twenty years since its inception.
Highlights
Since its publication, The Responsibility to Protect has stimulated two decades of debate, argument, and controversy
I was a member of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS), chaired by Gareth Evans and Mohamed Sahnoun, and took an active part in the drafting of the report that came to be known as The Responsibility to Protect, published in
We took the contingent realities of our time to be permanent features of the international landscape: American ascendancy; China on the rise but, like Russia, reluctantly acquiescent to American dominance, resulting in a Security Council prepared to legitimize the leadership of the “indispensable” nation
Summary
The Responsibility to Protect has stimulated two decades of debate, argument, and controversy. The Responsibility to Protect in a Changing World Order: Twenty Years since Its Inception
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
