Abstract

Since 1973, the U.S. economy has experienced three business cycles, with the 1973 and 1981 recessions being the most severe since the depression. These cycles have been unevenly distributed across the regions of the country, with East North Central states experiencing the greatest swings in employment and income. While a number of researchers have documented and examined the reasons for regional variations in cyclical employment and income [4–6], little is known about the responsiveness of metropolitan economies to the national business cycle. Are central cities more sensitive to the national cycle than suburban economies? If so, what factors, aside from differences in the composition of their local economies, explain the variations? The purpose of this paper is to address these two questions. A better understanding of metropolitan responses to the national business cycles can guide both national countercyclical investment strategies and local taxing and spending policy.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.