Abstract

The response of an experimental sarcoma to single doses and two fractions of x-rays and fast neutrons has been investigated to test the hypothesis that slowly shrinking sarcomata will reoxygenate poorly and therefore will benefit more from fractionated neutron treatment than from fractionated x-ray treatment, in contrast with rapidly shrinking carcinomata. Neutrons were approximately three times more effective than x-rays, both for single doses and for two fractions given in 48 hours, when regrowth was used as a measure of response. This observation is closely similar to results previously obtained on a rat fibrosarcoma and contrasts with previous results from a mouse mammary carcinoma, and is in agreement with the hypothesis.

Highlights

  • MOST animal solid tumours have been found to contain hypoxic cells

  • Single doses of neutrons have been found to be more effective in damaging such tumours, relative to the effect on normal tissues, than single doses of x or y rays (e.g. Field, Jones and Thomlinson, 1967; Barendsen and Broerse, 1969; Fowler et al, 1972)

  • A natural process of reoxygenation of these hypoxic cells may occur in the intervals between doses if a fractionated course of irradiation is given (Thomlinson, 1968)

Read more

Summary

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The CBA sarcoma used in the present experiments (Sarcoma F) was obtained from Hewitt, who has previously described its origin and its use in various radiobiological studies involving measurements of cell survival (Hewitt and Wilson, 1961; Hewitt, 1966). Growth curves were constructed to animals breathing oxygen appear signiby plotting the average value for the geometric ficantly less effective than a single dose, mean diameters of the tumours of a group of mice given the same treatment. 3.-Dose response curves obtained by integrating the area between each tumour regrowth curve and an upper size limit of 12 mm mean diameter (arbitrary units) A similar change from positive to negative occurs with increasing doses of neutrons

Findings
DISCUSSION
Method for Comparing Treatments of Intact
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.