Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to examine Hartmut Rosa’s account of ‘resonance’. To this end, the analysis is divided into four parts. The first part elucidates the concept of resonance, including Rosa’s differentiation between horizontal, diagonal, and vertical ‘axes of resonance’ and their role in the construction of different ‘world-relations’. The second part centres on the concept of alienation, notably the degree to which it constitutes an integral element of modern life forms and, in a larger sense, of the human condition. The third part grapples with the dialectic of resonance and alienation, shedding light on the assumption that they are antithetical to each other, while contending that their in-depth study provides normative parameters to distinguish between ‘the good life’ and ‘the bad life’. The final part scrutinizes Rosa’s attempt to defend his outline of a sociological theory of resonance against objections raised by his critics and comprises a point-by-point assessment of his plea for a resonance-focused sociology of world-relations. The paper concludes by suggesting that, notwithstanding its limitations, Rosa’s approach represents one of the most promising developments in twenty-first-century critical theory.

Highlights

  • The main purpose of this paper is to examine Hartmut Rosa’s account of ‘resonance’

  • The second part centres on the concept of alienation, notably the degree to which it constitutes an integral element of modern life forms and, in a larger sense, of the human condition

  • The main purpose of this paper is to examine Hartmut Rosa’s account of ‘resonance’1, which is crucial to his outline of a Soziologie der Weltbeziehung

Read more

Summary

Extended author information available on the last page of the article

Centre on the allegedly preponderant role of the struggle for resources provide little insight into the nature, causes, and consequences of human alienation Both rationalist frameworks (such as resource mobilization and rational actor theories) and relationalist accounts (such as Bourdieu’s triad of field, habitus, and capital), since they interpret ‘resourcefulness’ narrowly in terms of ‘the accumulation of resources’, fail to grasp the extent to which experiences of selfrealization and self-transformation depend on various other factors—such as the human ability to mobilize the empowering potential derived from ‘axes of resonance’. The term ‘resonance’ refers to ways of relating to the world in which the objective, normative, and subjective components of human reality are the source of genuine engagement with vital aspects of one’s existence.

The Dialectic of Resonance and Alienation
Critical Reflections on Key Issues
No Alternative?
No Alienation?
Measuring Resonance?
Summary
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call