Abstract

H. Robert Baker provides an exemplary case study of the events leading up to the undeservedly obscure Supreme Court decision in Ableman v. Booth (1859). The case began with the liberation of Joshua Glover, a fugitive slave, in Wisconsin. Baker recounts the events surrounding Glover's capture and freeing, but the book's real contribution comes in its account of what happened after Glover left the scene, relocating to Canada. After leading the effort to liberate Glover, Sherman Booth was indicted in federal court for his role in Glover's escape. Booth challenged his conviction not by appealing within the federal court system but by seeking a writ of habeas corpus from the Wisconsin state courts. Directly challenging the supremacy of the federal courts in interpreting the Constitution, the Wisconsin Supreme Court held that it had the power to order federal officials to release Booth and did exactly that. The U.S. Supreme Court unsurprisingly reversed the state court, holding that it could not command federal officials to release Booth even if it believed that Booth's conviction and detention violated the Constitution. In the aftermath, Booth was accused in a case of sexual abuse. He was acquitted, but his credibility was “shredded“ (p. 166). Jailed in Milwaukee, Booth escaped with his friends' assistance and remained at large for two months. President James Buchanan pardoned him on March 11, 1861.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.