Abstract

AbstractThe simulation and prediction of winter Northern Hemisphere atmospheric blocking in the seasonal prediction systems from the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) is analysed. Blocking statistics from the operational November‐initialised seasonal hindcasts are evaluated in three generations of models: System3, System4, and System5 (SEAS5). Improvements in the climatological representation of blocking are observed in the most recent model configurations, with reduced bias over North Pacific and Greenland. Minor progress is seen over the European sector, where SEAS5 still underestimates the observed blocking frequency. SEAS5 blocking interannual variability is underestimated too and is proportional to the climatological frequency, highlighting that a negative bias in the blocking frequency implies an underestimation of the interannual variance. SEAS5 predictive skill and signal‐to‐noise ratio remain low, but interesting positive results are found over Western and Central Europe. Improved forecasts with reduced ensemble spread are obtained during El Niño years, especially at low latitudes. Complementary experiments show that the statistics of blocking are improved following atmospheric and oceanic resolution increase. Conversely, they remain largely insensitive to coupled model sea‐surface temperature (SST) errors. On the other hand, the implementation of stochastic parameterisations tends to displace blocking activity equatorward. Finally, by comparing seasonal hindcasts with climate runs using the same model, we highlight that the largest contributors to the chronic underestimation of blocking are persistent errors in the atmospheric model. It is also shown that SST errors have a larger impact on blocking bias in climate runs than in seasonal runs, and that increased ocean model resolution contributes to improved blocking more effectively in climate runs. Seasonal forecasts can thus be considered a suitable test‐bed for model development targeting blocking improvement in climate models.

Highlights

  • Atmospheric blocking is one of the most investigated weather patterns in current climate science

  • This shows an absolute maximum over the North Pacific and two secondary maxima over Greenland and Europe (9–12% of blocked days)

  • From a dynamical point of view, blocking occurring over Greenland and the North Pacific is quite different from the blocking over the European sector, since the former is characterised by cyclonic wave breaking, while the latter is associated with anticyclonic wave breaking (Davini et al, 2012)

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Atmospheric blocking is one of the most investigated weather patterns in current climate science. Some encouraging results have been obtained in recent years (Matsueda, 2011; Davini and D’Andrea, 2020), improving blocking in weather and climate simulations remains a challenging task: reduced biases have been obtained following atmospheric horizontal resolution refinement (Jung et al, 2012; Davini and D’Andrea, 2020) and when an oceanic model with reduced North Atlantic sea-surface temperature (SST) bias is used (Scaife et al, 2010). A comparison with a set of climate runs using the same model version as SEAS5, which follow the High Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP) protocol (Haarsma et al, 2016), will be carried out in order to assess the relevance of model initialisation and the impact of SST biases

DATA AND METHODS
RESULTS
30 Correlation
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call