Abstract
Most decision-making inventories measure bias and little attempt is made to identify individuals who are more likely to maximize economic opportunities. Four experiments tested a novel measure of individual differences in normative decision making that is easy to administer and identifies a wide range of variance in economic choice. All four experiments demonstrated that responses to the Repeated Gambles Task (RGT) are independent of ostensibly related measures and identify the tendency to make normative decisions. The RGT may be used in educational, research and applied settings to examine the effectiveness of training and to aid in research and hiring decisions. As such, the RGT is offered as a novel tool for use in a wide-range of basic and applied settings.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
