Abstract

Multiple, action-based space representations are each based on the extent to which action is possible toward a specific sector of space, such as near/reachable and far/unreachable. Studies on tool-use revealed how the boundaries between these representations are dynamic. Space is not only multidimensional and dynamic, but it is also known for interacting with other dimensions of magnitude, such as time. However, whether time operates on similar action-driven multiple representations and whether it can be modulated by tool-use is yet unknown. To address these issues, healthy participants performed a time bisection task in two spatial positions (near and far space) before and after an active tool-use training, which consisted of performing goal-directed actions holding a tool with their right hand (Experiment 1). Before training, perceived stimuli duration was influenced by their spatial position defined by action. Hence, a dissociation emerged between near/reachable and far/unreachable space. Strikingly, this dissociation disappeared after the active tool-use training since temporal stimuli were now perceived as nearer. The remapping was not found when a passive tool-training was executed (Experiment 2) or when the active tool-training was performed with participants’ left hand (Experiment 3). Moreover, no time remapping was observed following an equivalent active hand-training but without a tool (Experiment 4). Taken together, our findings reveal that time processing is based on action-driven multiple representations. The dynamic nature of these representations is demonstrated by the remapping of time, which is action- and effector-dependent.

Highlights

  • In everyday life spatial and temporal information is constantly necessary for action: reaching, pointing, or grasping an object all need an accurate estimate of spatial and temporal features of the environment

  • This study explored whether time processing mirrors the multi-dimensional organization of space, and whether it can be modulated by a training, actively or passively executed with a tool or actively executed with hand

  • The existence of multiple representations of space is well established [1,35], as well as the effects of tool-use on the boundaries between different spatial representations, which reflects the flexibility of space reachability [4]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In everyday life spatial and temporal information is constantly necessary for action: reaching, pointing, or grasping an object all need an accurate estimate of spatial and temporal features of the environment. The effects of tool-use support the functional distinction between ‘working’ space (i.e., the near space representation involved in goal-directed action) and ‘protective/defensive’ space (i.e., the near space representation involved in the protection of the body) [15]. We investigated whether time can be influenced by a reachable/near and unreachable/far dimension of space, and whether time processing can be modulated by tool-use training. To address these questions, we tested young healthy participants in a time bisection task requiring to reproduce half of the duration of visual stimuli presented in near and far space. If time estimation can be modulated by action, a time remapping in far space may be observed; stimuli duration in far and near space may be perceived as the same following tool-training

Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
General Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call