Abstract
The amount of anerobic energy released during exercise might modify the initial phase of oxygen recovery (fast-O2debt) post-exercise. Therefore, the present study aimed to analyze the reliability of peak oxygen uptake estimate by back-extrapolation under different swimming conditions in the severe-intensity domain, verifying how the alterations of the recovery profile and anerobic energy demand might affect values. Twenty swimmers (16.7 ± 2.4years, 173.5 ± 10.2cm, and 66.4 ± 10.6kg) performed an incremental intermittent step protocol (IIST: 6 × 250 plus 1 × 200m, IIST_v200m) for the assessment of . The off-kinetics used a bi-exponential model to discriminate primary amplitude, time delay, and time constant (A1off, TD1off, and τoff) for assessment of fast-O2debt post IIST_v200m, 200-m single-trial (v200m), and rest-to-work transition at 90% delta (v90%Δ) tests. The linear regression estimated and the rate of recovery (BE-slope) post each swimming performance. The ANOVA (Sidak as post hoc) compared to the estimates of in v200m, IIST_v200m, and v90%Δ, and the coefficient of dispersion (R2) analyzed the association between tests. The values of during IIST did not differ from in v200m, IIST_v200m, and v90%Δ (55.7 ± 7.1 vs. 53.7 ± 8.2 vs. 56.3 ± 8.2 vs. 54.1 ± 9.1mlkg-1min-1, p > 0.05, respectively). However, the variance is moderately explained by only in IIST_v200m and v90%Δ (RAdj 2 = 0.44 and RAdj 2 = 0.43, p < 0.01). The TD1off and τoff responses post IIST_v200m were considerably lower than those in both v200m (6.1 ± 3.8 and 33.0 ± 9.5s vs. 10.9 ± 3.5 and 47.7 ± 7.9 s; p < 0.05) and v90%Δ ( 10.1 ± 3.8 and 44.3 ± 6.3 s, p < 0.05). The BE-slope post IIST_v200m was faster than inv200m andv90%Δ (-47.9 ± 14.6 vs. -33.0 ± 10.4 vs. -33.6 ± 13.8mlkg-1, p < 0.01), and the total anerobic (AnaerTotal) demand was lower in IIST_v200m (37.4 ± 9.4mlkg-1) than in 200m and 90%Δ (51.4 ± 9.4 and 46.2 ± 7.7mlkg-1, p < 0.01). Finally, the τ1off was related to AnaerTotal in IIST_v200m, v200m, and v90%Δ (r = 0.64, r = 0.61, and r = 0.64, p < 0.01). The initial phase of the recovery profile provided different (although reliable) conditions for the estimate of with BE procedures, which accounted for the moderate effect of anerobic release on off-kinetics, but compromised exceptionally the estimate in the 200-m single trial.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.