Abstract
In 1960, the Privy Council of the United Kingdom, in Public Prosecutor v. Oie Hee Koi and connected appeal, refused to recognize the prisoner of war (POW) status of some of its citizens who were captured while acting as members of the opposing forces in hostilities because they had breached their duty of allegiance owed to the Crown. The purpose of this article is to prove that it defies the spirit of the Geneva Conventions (GCs) as well as the development of international humanitarian law to deprive a national of the detaining power of his POW status solely on the basis of nationality or duty of allegiance. The first half of this article shows that the non-allegiance requirement of POW status is not sustainable; the second part demonstrates that the object and purpose of humanitarian law require such nationals to be covered by GC III.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
